Bain, Broad, Helen & Annette.

Over the last couple of days these four people have been the focus of the National Media.

David Bain.

Released on bail (the criteria was more than met regarding the Bail Act) which the Crown had then the affront to oppose, perhaps, as a last minute attempt at saving face.
Is this the type of Crown Prosecution Service we expect from our Civil Servants?
Should David face a retrial?
Definitely, if the Crown is sure of the facts that support “beyond reasonable doubt” that he committed a mass murder and not rely upon a speculation of web weaving by members of the Police to get a conviction.
David, enjoy your compensation when it is awarded, rebuild your life but be remain vigilant and don’t allow this travesty to be swept under the carpet so that it may be replicated upon others.

Let us reflect on the words of Joe;

"Mainly because the police in particular were so obstructive in assisting with investigating things that didn't get investigated properly in the start."

Mr Karam has been vocal in his criticism of the police, alleging incompetence which resulted in the police suing him, unsuccessfully, for defamation.

Howard Broad.

Unconfirmed gossip is that Howard is to give a Public apology to the SPCA on behalf of the NZ Police.

Yes, ‘Bestiality at Broads’ was the ' menu and venue' according to Ian Wishart in his Investigate Magazine.

Seems, it was TRUE!

Danger, Danger, damage control says the Management and string pullers, espouse diatribe that alleges Howard wasn’t aware that filth flicks of the most indecent acts were screening in his space.
The whistleblower was not an unfamiliar name being Mr Wayne Idour.
Mr Idour states he recalls "attending a party at Howard Broad's house," where there were movies being shown on a movie projector, one of them depicting bestiality, and a significant amount of alcohol consumed.

Helen & Annette.

However, Police Minister Annette King said Idour was the man who showed the pornographic movie.
“He was a policeman at the time in Dunedin, He played the film.” said Ms. King
She further attacked him for his role as a private investigator contracted by individuals who coincidentally belong to a religious organization to scrutinize members of the Labour Party including Helen and family to ascertain if irregularities were being conducted and condoned.
In September last year Mr Idour admitted that he and a colleague had been hired by a member of the Exclusive Brethren religious sect to spy on Miss Clark and other Labour MPs.
He said his mission was to uncover "illegal activities" and he would soon reveal sensational information.
Is this the sensational information asks Policewatch? Or do we have more yet to come.
Helen also openly and without Parliamentary Privilege has accused Mr Idour as the supplier of filth to Howard’s soiree.
Crunch time, far more is implicated with these revelations than is generally perceived.
The Labour Party and its members who have been under scrutiny and have had direct accusations of inappropriateness leveled fully against them, apply an ostrich syndrome and ride the storm out, yet have never sought to have these accusations remedied permanently via defamation?
WHY?

Mr Idour and Wishart have you both now on public record making statements that defame their integrity, looking forward to further development!!!

It was further implied by Helen that Ian and his Investigate Magazine were funded by the Brethren or the National Party, Bollocks!!
The advice from Policewatch is if you are in a hole, stop digging!

Policewatch also does not have affiliation with any religion, race, sect or gender.