West Auckland Police - How far will they go??????

(Photo - Constables Klooster and Gayle.)

Constable Kloosters involvement was stated to have been the arrest and processing of Anita for a charge of wilful damage and in the following weeks, a further tresspass and assault charge.

It was rather amazing at the 23rd hour in the Jury trial at Auckland in November 2006 with a Crown case collapsing, Constable Klooster under oath stated he witnessed me headbutting an assailer.

Isn't it rather amazing at the aborted trial in May 2005, The Prosecution hadn't considered him viable as a witness, at the depositions in January 2006, again he was found not to be a source of evidence.

It was only with my having summonsed him on matters of questionable process and procedure that this information magically emerged.

What implications can be drawn here? Perjuy? Perverting the course of Justice? simple Police and Prosecution inefficiency?

Next post in the Police v Catton casefile - dealings with Area Commander Mark O'Connor