PM demands action over police sex-tape
Prime Minister Helen Clark has weighed into the latest police sex scandal saying any officers found to have been involved should be disciplined.
She said: "Given the videotapes and the rest of it, we have to assume that something happened and if anything like that happened, it's frankly disgusting.
Helen may I remind you, the informant told Sunday News she considered those encounters consensual at the time.
Where should we start at depravity.
Chris Carter, David Benson (far from) Pope etc...., or the many lesbian and homosexual friends that you keep, for which you have enabled through perverse legislation that they can have progeny emanating from unnatural social engineering.
Frankly Ms Clark, pots shouldn't call the kettles black.
Perhaps you might start the witchhunt into depravities conducted within your closest circles.
Monday, 26 March 2007
Wednesday, 21 March 2007
RE: Police Watch NZ
I would like to post an item relating to an incident I have had with a corrupt cop.
Is this the correct e-mail address to send the post to.
Regards,
R T S
Police Watch NZ says: You have found the site that will not only air your grievance without fear but take any issue further to achieve resolution devoid of the toothless delaying practices of an incumbent P.C.A.
Is this the correct e-mail address to send the post to.
Regards,
R T S
Police Watch NZ says: You have found the site that will not only air your grievance without fear but take any issue further to achieve resolution devoid of the toothless delaying practices of an incumbent P.C.A.
Police Corruption
Dear Police Watch NZ
I read David Farrar’s column as it contains very useful Information. I read his recent reference to Police Watch NZ. There is nothing new about Police Corruption. It is a “culture”.
I have attached relevant documents. I as yet have not responded to the Hon Justice Goddard. You will notice she does not refer to the following extracted from my complaint:
“My allegations of corruption and breaches of s. 116 Crimes Act 1961: Conspiring to defeat justice---Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who conspires to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat the course of justice: are laid against Police Commissioner Howard Broad and those in the Office of the Commissioner who conspired to “bury” my complaints of: Misappropriation of Helen Clark’s leader’s funds. Included also are those who have knowledge of my allegations and have not responded”.
She also ignores the contents of the letter to the Auditor-General which she also received.
So corruption flourishes. You are free to use the above information as you see fit. It is all on Police Files.
I am a retired Industrial Chemist and Works Manager so I have done my research before committing my allegations to paper
Most members of Parliament have copies of the above attachments, but not of Justice Goddard’s response
Yours Sincerely
F R
Wanganui
Note from Police Watch NZ, The referred attachments will be posted upon the forum when TIF format has been successfully converted using our current OCR programming.
I read David Farrar’s column as it contains very useful Information. I read his recent reference to Police Watch NZ. There is nothing new about Police Corruption. It is a “culture”.
I have attached relevant documents. I as yet have not responded to the Hon Justice Goddard. You will notice she does not refer to the following extracted from my complaint:
“My allegations of corruption and breaches of s. 116 Crimes Act 1961: Conspiring to defeat justice---Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who conspires to obstruct, prevent, pervert, or defeat the course of justice: are laid against Police Commissioner Howard Broad and those in the Office of the Commissioner who conspired to “bury” my complaints of: Misappropriation of Helen Clark’s leader’s funds. Included also are those who have knowledge of my allegations and have not responded”.
She also ignores the contents of the letter to the Auditor-General which she also received.
So corruption flourishes. You are free to use the above information as you see fit. It is all on Police Files.
I am a retired Industrial Chemist and Works Manager so I have done my research before committing my allegations to paper
Most members of Parliament have copies of the above attachments, but not of Justice Goddard’s response
Yours Sincerely
F R
Wanganui
Note from Police Watch NZ, The referred attachments will be posted upon the forum when TIF format has been successfully converted using our current OCR programming.
Thursday, 15 March 2007
Canterbury Police Corrupt????
Ten Canterbury police officers have been targeted on the internet with claims of corruption against them.
Canterbury police have dismissed the allegations and are investigating legal action against the person behind it.
The site rates the officers for their level of corruption.
Superintendent Sandra Manderson, said the website was "totally inappropriate and defamatory".
She called for the site to be removed.
"Our legal services are looking at it," she said.
"We have advised everyone who has been named – most are not particularly impressed."
One of the Canterbury officers named on the website described the blogger as cowardly and driven by "personal vendetta".
The "anti-police corruption" website did not appear to breach Google's rules because it did not make threats or contain officers' phone numbers or addresses.
Ten Canterbury police officers have been targeted on the internet with claims of corruption against them.
Canterbury police have dismissed the allegations and are investigating legal action against the person behind it.
The site rates the officers for their level of corruption.
Superintendent Sandra Manderson, said the website was "totally inappropriate and defamatory".
She called for the site to be removed.
"Our legal services are looking at it," she said.
"We have advised everyone who has been named – most are not particularly impressed."
One of the Canterbury officers named on the website described the blogger as cowardly and driven by "personal vendetta".
The "anti-police corruption" website did not appear to breach Google's rules because it did not make threats or contain officers' phone numbers or addresses.
Wednesday, 14 March 2007
Letter to the Minister - Please Respond
2nd March 2007
Hon. Annette King
Minister of Police
Parliament Buildings
Wellington
RE: CRN 4090040820/1
Dear Ms. King,
I refer to correspondence of 21st February2007 from Alistair Murray, NZ Police Senior Legal Advisor, under appointment to respond to the issues that I raised being of concern.
I cordially invited Alistair to conduct interviews with both Jim Bagnall and myself that would have enabled unbiased information gathering that adds credibility to my statements.
This was categorically refused and he has provided a text book response in his summarisation that Policing activity was beyond reproach.
There are discrepancies with my detailed disclosure requests in 2005 and the disclosure notifications supplied between 16th January 2006, 9th February 2006 and finally 22nd March 2006, yet in 2005 I was placed in Court for Summary Jurisdiction in respect of the charges.
In respect of my leadership complaint towards Area Commander Mark O’Connor.
Firstly, I refer historically to his ignorant stonewall stance in attempting to provide resolution for Anita and myself and our family in respect of the atrocities committed against our daughter Antonia (aged 5 at the time) in 1999 which included vile sodomising and insertions of figurines into orifices by a neighbouring youth and his lack of response when the Policing Department under his command completely failed in their respective duties to bring about Justice.
Ministerial intervention and an investigation conducted by Det. Superintendent Roger Carsons concluded with 2 (two) adverse reports and transferral of duties on Officers concerned in the investigation.
Secondly, I refer to Mark and his personal attack upon myself which is clearly documented in correspondence from his Office in which it also contains a threat of arrest against Jim Bagnall and I for wanting to establish Mens Refuge in his Policing Jurisdiction.
Brian Louden, the Community Liaison Officer commended our proposal.
I really do not wish to impose upon the Ministers valuable time upon this matter but have to inform her that satisfaction has not been met by the second rate attempt of legal browbeat by Alistair Murray
I therefore request that you furnish your nominated recipient for service of documents to be filed representing a costs and punitive award in respect of the failed prosecution of
CRN 4090040820/1
I would however be placated with a proper investigation conducted by a dedicated professional without biased agenda to address the shortcomings of the NZ Police Force in Waitakere that have been identified, should a constructive second opinion be sought by yourself.
I await your comment and remain,
Yours Faithfully
Paul Catton
Fathers Coalition
East Auckland Refuge for Men and Families
Secretary of The Republic Party of New Zealand
2nd March 2007
Hon. Annette King
Minister of Police
Parliament Buildings
Wellington
RE: CRN 4090040820/1
Dear Ms. King,
I refer to correspondence of 21st February2007 from Alistair Murray, NZ Police Senior Legal Advisor, under appointment to respond to the issues that I raised being of concern.
I cordially invited Alistair to conduct interviews with both Jim Bagnall and myself that would have enabled unbiased information gathering that adds credibility to my statements.
This was categorically refused and he has provided a text book response in his summarisation that Policing activity was beyond reproach.
There are discrepancies with my detailed disclosure requests in 2005 and the disclosure notifications supplied between 16th January 2006, 9th February 2006 and finally 22nd March 2006, yet in 2005 I was placed in Court for Summary Jurisdiction in respect of the charges.
In respect of my leadership complaint towards Area Commander Mark O’Connor.
Firstly, I refer historically to his ignorant stonewall stance in attempting to provide resolution for Anita and myself and our family in respect of the atrocities committed against our daughter Antonia (aged 5 at the time) in 1999 which included vile sodomising and insertions of figurines into orifices by a neighbouring youth and his lack of response when the Policing Department under his command completely failed in their respective duties to bring about Justice.
Ministerial intervention and an investigation conducted by Det. Superintendent Roger Carsons concluded with 2 (two) adverse reports and transferral of duties on Officers concerned in the investigation.
Secondly, I refer to Mark and his personal attack upon myself which is clearly documented in correspondence from his Office in which it also contains a threat of arrest against Jim Bagnall and I for wanting to establish Mens Refuge in his Policing Jurisdiction.
Brian Louden, the Community Liaison Officer commended our proposal.
I really do not wish to impose upon the Ministers valuable time upon this matter but have to inform her that satisfaction has not been met by the second rate attempt of legal browbeat by Alistair Murray
I therefore request that you furnish your nominated recipient for service of documents to be filed representing a costs and punitive award in respect of the failed prosecution of
CRN 4090040820/1
I would however be placated with a proper investigation conducted by a dedicated professional without biased agenda to address the shortcomings of the NZ Police Force in Waitakere that have been identified, should a constructive second opinion be sought by yourself.
I await your comment and remain,
Yours Faithfully
Paul Catton
Fathers Coalition
East Auckland Refuge for Men and Families
Secretary of The Republic Party of New Zealand
SORRY!! I'M OFF DUTY
Police management are suggesting off duty officers should not act but should call back to base if they come across a crime.
What utter stupidity.
Any sensible police officer who sees a crime he can’t handle would call for assistance whether on or off duty, however when off duty we expect a police officer to be part of the community. What this government is telling the police is you are going to be our little state soldiers, forget your community. You can imagine the conflict for police officers when confronted by section 59 episodes in public; how they would respond if they are expected to uphold the law. Imagine the office duty police officer out for jog, and finds a rape in progress. You’re being raped madam, just hold on there while I find a telephone.This adequately highlights the deficiency in the thinking left wing academics. We are being governed by a bunch of dolts.
They want us to descend to their level of thinking – think not.
BB
Auckland
Police management are suggesting off duty officers should not act but should call back to base if they come across a crime.
What utter stupidity.
Any sensible police officer who sees a crime he can’t handle would call for assistance whether on or off duty, however when off duty we expect a police officer to be part of the community. What this government is telling the police is you are going to be our little state soldiers, forget your community. You can imagine the conflict for police officers when confronted by section 59 episodes in public; how they would respond if they are expected to uphold the law. Imagine the office duty police officer out for jog, and finds a rape in progress. You’re being raped madam, just hold on there while I find a telephone.This adequately highlights the deficiency in the thinking left wing academics. We are being governed by a bunch of dolts.
They want us to descend to their level of thinking – think not.
BB
Auckland
Thursday, 8 March 2007
Greg and Rob, stop waffling and support the Assistant Commissioner.
Suspended Assistant Commissioner Clint Rickards has called on his fellow police chiefs to chip in for his legal fight to stay in the force.
Mr Rickards has asked the Police Managers Guild, the union that represents senior officers, for financial assistance as he tries to resolve outstanding "employment issues".
The guild - which did not pay anything towards Mr Rickards' $500,000 plus legal fees for defending his two criminal trials.
Guild president Rob Abbott said Mr Rickards' request had come this week and "we've got no idea officially what he's facing in these employment issues and our rules have certain criteria. Obviously, he's getting that together and we will consider the matter."
Mr Abbott said the guild gave Mr Rickards some "limited assistance" to deal with employment matters when the Louise Nicholas allegations first surfaced publicly in 2004.
He confirmed Mr Rickards asked for further assistance once the allegations became a criminal matter - and although he would not comment further it is understood Mr Rickards was turned down.
Mr Abbott said the guild had not taken "a political stance" in declining to assist Mr Rickards' criminal defence, (Tui Billboard - Yeah Right)
"I guess that would be the easy way to look at it. But we had to go straight down the middle on the criteria and the decisions we made in committee were based simply on whether or not his particular situation fitted in the criteria."
Mr Abbott said the guild's rules meant it would assist a member where the matter "arises directly from their employment rather than if it happens off-duty or in their personal life".
An officer accused of using excessive force during an arrest or of the dishonest use of funds were examples of causes it would support.
Punitive action unlawfully taken against Clint by his employer demands assistance by the Guild!!
Suspended Assistant Commissioner Clint Rickards has called on his fellow police chiefs to chip in for his legal fight to stay in the force.
Mr Rickards has asked the Police Managers Guild, the union that represents senior officers, for financial assistance as he tries to resolve outstanding "employment issues".
The guild - which did not pay anything towards Mr Rickards' $500,000 plus legal fees for defending his two criminal trials.
Guild president Rob Abbott said Mr Rickards' request had come this week and "we've got no idea officially what he's facing in these employment issues and our rules have certain criteria. Obviously, he's getting that together and we will consider the matter."
Mr Abbott said the guild gave Mr Rickards some "limited assistance" to deal with employment matters when the Louise Nicholas allegations first surfaced publicly in 2004.
He confirmed Mr Rickards asked for further assistance once the allegations became a criminal matter - and although he would not comment further it is understood Mr Rickards was turned down.
Mr Abbott said the guild had not taken "a political stance" in declining to assist Mr Rickards' criminal defence, (Tui Billboard - Yeah Right)
"I guess that would be the easy way to look at it. But we had to go straight down the middle on the criteria and the decisions we made in committee were based simply on whether or not his particular situation fitted in the criteria."
Mr Abbott said the guild's rules meant it would assist a member where the matter "arises directly from their employment rather than if it happens off-duty or in their personal life".
An officer accused of using excessive force during an arrest or of the dishonest use of funds were examples of causes it would support.
Punitive action unlawfully taken against Clint by his employer demands assistance by the Guild!!
Doh!! Caught on Tape
A North Shore police officer has been caught making lewd sexual remarks about a female colleague .
The officer made the comment to another police officer during a conversation that was being recorded.
The officer who made the comments is believed to be on annual leave.
A spokeswoman for Police Minister Annette King said the Minister would not comment.
The National Party's police spokesman Chester Borrows said the North Shore officer's comments were an "unfortunate incident" given the recent sex trials and attempts by police to separate themselves from the perceived culture within the police during the 1980s.
And the 90's and also not forgetting post millenium Chester.
A North Shore police officer has been caught making lewd sexual remarks about a female colleague .
The officer made the comment to another police officer during a conversation that was being recorded.
The officer who made the comments is believed to be on annual leave.
A spokeswoman for Police Minister Annette King said the Minister would not comment.
The National Party's police spokesman Chester Borrows said the North Shore officer's comments were an "unfortunate incident" given the recent sex trials and attempts by police to separate themselves from the perceived culture within the police during the 1980s.
And the 90's and also not forgetting post millenium Chester.
White substance sent to police in post.
Was this an order for recreational use or something more sinister?
N Z Post is trying to identify white substance found in mail addressed to police.
Some workers at the Christchurch mail centre were hospitalised for observation after coming into contact with the substance last night and complaining of stinging eyes.
They were discharged this morning.
Was this an order for recreational use or something more sinister?
N Z Post is trying to identify white substance found in mail addressed to police.
Some workers at the Christchurch mail centre were hospitalised for observation after coming into contact with the substance last night and complaining of stinging eyes.
They were discharged this morning.
Wednesday, 7 March 2007
Re Summons 06070021579 and Prosecution
On the 7th of May-06 I was charged with **Used a vehicle in manner liable to cause Annoyance** and given an instant fine of $600-00 soon after an organised protest outside the residence of the Speaker of the House Margaret Wilson
On the 9th of August the charge was changed to **Noisy Vehicle – Owners Offence** and the instant fine reduced to $150-00.
On the 14th of September the charges where dropped because of **Officer Error** - As stated by Inspector Matt Fitzsimons – Officer in Charge – Police Infringement Bureau – HQ – Wellington
On the 25th of September a Deputy Registrar of the Tauranga Court wrote to make it clear that the original Charge ($600-00) was to be heard on the 5th Oct 06.
On the 25th of September (Yes the same day) a different Deputy Registrar advised me that the original Charge ($600-0) was to be heard on the 8th of November.
On the 7th of October-07 I received a Summons to appear in the Tauranga District Court to answer to a charge of **Disorderly Behaviour** while.
A preliminary hearing 25-Oct-06 was dispensed with as I had pleaded **NOT Guilty**.
On the 13th of December we proceeded to Court and a 20 person demonstration in support of the right to freedom of speech and right to protest was held outside the Court with Media in attendance and well reported over the next few days in the NZ-Herald and on Radio Live.
Thanks to Simon Collins, Juliet Rowan, Michael Laws and others involved.
Court Hearing
Barrister Rod Hooker was defence counsel at the hearing and exposed aspects of serious nature that included Harassment and Impropriety conducted by the Police and Judiciary.
The Police Prosecutor and Police Informant withdrew the charge as it is presumed they realised that they had been set up by a vindictive Female Police Officer and the JP who was presiding on the day.
Resolution required
1. Disciplinary action to be taken regarding a Female Police Officer who abused me, took my vehicle Keys, and interfered with a perfectly legitimate orderly Protest, whilst completely ignoring the physical violence shown toward me and wilful damage to my vehicle.
2. A removal of the authority granted in respect of the presiding JP allowing her to sit in judgement relating to matters of Court.
3. Provision of costs incurred with my having to defend this vexatious litigation driven to stifle the freedom of speech and the right to protest.
4. A compensatory and punitive award of $150,000 to cover ongoing trauma and the ordeal which has been endured to date.
Jim Bailey
Founder – HandsOnEqualParent.ORG
15B Roseberry Ave, Birkenhead,
North Shore City,
AUCKLAND
09-480-4373
http://www.handsonequalparent.org.nz/
(ABRIDGED)
On the 7th of May-06 I was charged with **Used a vehicle in manner liable to cause Annoyance** and given an instant fine of $600-00 soon after an organised protest outside the residence of the Speaker of the House Margaret Wilson
On the 9th of August the charge was changed to **Noisy Vehicle – Owners Offence** and the instant fine reduced to $150-00.
On the 14th of September the charges where dropped because of **Officer Error** - As stated by Inspector Matt Fitzsimons – Officer in Charge – Police Infringement Bureau – HQ – Wellington
On the 25th of September a Deputy Registrar of the Tauranga Court wrote to make it clear that the original Charge ($600-00) was to be heard on the 5th Oct 06.
On the 25th of September (Yes the same day) a different Deputy Registrar advised me that the original Charge ($600-0) was to be heard on the 8th of November.
On the 7th of October-07 I received a Summons to appear in the Tauranga District Court to answer to a charge of **Disorderly Behaviour** while.
A preliminary hearing 25-Oct-06 was dispensed with as I had pleaded **NOT Guilty**.
On the 13th of December we proceeded to Court and a 20 person demonstration in support of the right to freedom of speech and right to protest was held outside the Court with Media in attendance and well reported over the next few days in the NZ-Herald and on Radio Live.
Thanks to Simon Collins, Juliet Rowan, Michael Laws and others involved.
Court Hearing
Barrister Rod Hooker was defence counsel at the hearing and exposed aspects of serious nature that included Harassment and Impropriety conducted by the Police and Judiciary.
The Police Prosecutor and Police Informant withdrew the charge as it is presumed they realised that they had been set up by a vindictive Female Police Officer and the JP who was presiding on the day.
Resolution required
1. Disciplinary action to be taken regarding a Female Police Officer who abused me, took my vehicle Keys, and interfered with a perfectly legitimate orderly Protest, whilst completely ignoring the physical violence shown toward me and wilful damage to my vehicle.
2. A removal of the authority granted in respect of the presiding JP allowing her to sit in judgement relating to matters of Court.
3. Provision of costs incurred with my having to defend this vexatious litigation driven to stifle the freedom of speech and the right to protest.
4. A compensatory and punitive award of $150,000 to cover ongoing trauma and the ordeal which has been endured to date.
Jim Bailey
Founder – HandsOnEqualParent.ORG
15B Roseberry Ave, Birkenhead,
North Shore City,
AUCKLAND
09-480-4373
http://www.handsonequalparent.org.nz/
(ABRIDGED)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)